Desværre mange useriøse

[Sugarmann 18]

• 
• 
• 

Har over flere gange været medlem af sugardaters og er det i skrivende stund stadig.

Desværre synes jeg der er mange useriøs.!profiler hvor man skriver længe og udførligt med, aftaler præmissen for at opleve de sletter profilen.

Hvis dette medie på sigt skal have retfærdighed og give fair vilkår, når det betyde væsentlig strengere krav til kvinder/pigerne evt. med tilsvarende betaling fra deres side som det er hos mændene. Pt er det et ubrugeligt koncept 

 

 

[Guest yuki]

For me it is the concept of sugardating that is the underlying problem. In my personal experience I have had to deal with men who want an escort but want to pay her less than half. Sugadating in my view contains an exclusivity at the base, a unique relationship with a person with a lot of money. There is a misunderstanding at the base. There should be a relationship at the base. But as you know it is difficult to establish a relationship, all the more so if money is involved. And there are not that many men who can afford a sugarbabe.

In my reading of the facts SD has raised the prices to try to make the men's side more exclusive but in the end it's so full of fakes that he should just make a more serious request for verification to protect both sides. 

Their plan to make sugardating accessible to all is a concept that - in my opinion - has already failed. Because it's not sugardating.

[Guest yuki]

Sugarmann skrev, for 28 minutter siden:

È stato membro di Sugardaters diverse volte e lo è ancora al momento in cui scrivo.

Sfortunatamente, penso che ci siano molti profili frivoli.! dove scrivi lungo e dettagliato con, d'accordo sul presupposto per esperienza cancellano il profilo.

Se, a lungo termine, questi media devono avere giustizia e fornire condizioni eque, quando ciò significa requisiti significativamente più severi per le donne/ragazze, forse con corrispondente pagamento da parte loro come avviene con gli uomini. Al momento è un concetto inutile 

 

 

opss forgot to quote the post, because I'm dumb

[Guest daddyo]

yuki skrev, for 27 minutter siden:

For me it is the concept of sugardating that is the underlying problem. In my personal experience I have had to deal with men who want an escort but want to pay her less than half. Sugadating in my view contains an exclusivity at the base, a unique relationship with a person with a lot of money. There is a misunderstanding at the base. There should be a relationship at the base. But as you know it is difficult to establish a relationship, all the more so if money is involved. And there are not that many men who can afford a sugarbabe.

In my reading of the facts SD has raised the prices to try to make the men's side more exclusive but in the end it's so full of fakes that he should just make a more serious request for verification to protect both sides. 

Their plan to make sugardating accessible to all is a concept that - in my opinion - has already failed. Because it's not sugardating.

Maybe you have a point, Sugardating isnt a cheap relation, and its and exclusive relation if it is 
Im trying to get that, had two , for nearly 2 years each, But its rare, and not looked after in the side
thanks for writing anyway

[Guest yuki]

daddyo skrev, for 7 minutter siden:

Maybe you have a point, Sugardating isnt a cheap relation, and its and exclusive relation if it is 
Im trying to get that, had two , for nearly 2 years each, But its rare, and not looked after in the side
thanks for writing anyway

Let's say that it is already difficult to establish a normal relationship, put money in the way and it's a disaster. 

On my side (but perhaps I'm an exception to the rule) I sincerely dreamt of finding a wealthy man with whom I could share good times besides sex.

But I quickly realised that it wasn't the desire on the opposite side. The desire was only to fuck, and for that maybe there are escorts etc.

When money is involved, people are often empty, lacking in content, and honestly this is the first requirement that attracts me to a man.

thanks u too 

[Guest daddyo]

yuki skrev, for 8 timer siden:

Let's say that it is already difficult to establish a normal relationship, put money in the way and it's a disaster. 

On my side (but perhaps I'm an exception to the rule) I sincerely dreamt of finding a wealthy man with whom I could share good times besides sex.

But I quickly realised that it wasn't the desire on the opposite side. The desire was only to fuck, and for that maybe there are escorts etc.

When money is involved, people are often empty, lacking in content, and honestly this is the first requirement that attracts me to a man.

thanks u too 

Likewise, and i expirience the same. theres a very few real relations there. And the ones that is, quickly gets away scared of being involved

[MikkelRæv64 101]

yuki skrev, for 11 timer siden:

For me it is the concept of sugardating that is the underlying problem. In my personal experience I have had to deal with men who want an escort but want to pay her less than half. Sugadating in my view contains an exclusivity at the base, a unique relationship with a person with a lot of money. There is a misunderstanding at the base. There should be a relationship at the base. But as you know it is difficult to establish a relationship, all the more so if money is involved. And there are not that many men who can afford a sugarbabe.

In my reading of the facts SD has raised the prices to try to make the men's side more exclusive but in the end it's so full of fakes that he should just make a more serious request for verification to protect both sides. 

Their plan to make sugardating accessible to all is a concept that - in my opinion - has already failed. Because it's not sugardating.

Maybee sugardating only exsist in your Dreams ... like a cheap holywood movie.

Sugardating in reel life in Danmark is a kind of "hobby prostitution".

[Guest yuki]

MikkelRæv64 skrev, for 8 minutter siden:

Maybee sugardating only exsist in your Dreams ... like a cheap holywood movie.

Sugardating in reel life in Danmark is a kind of "hobby prostitution".

I understand what you mean, but it seems to me like a failure of an idea or at least something dangerous. 

However, u can accept the opinions of others without denigrating them

[MikkelRæv64 101]

yuki skrev, 1 time siden:

I understand what you mean, but it seems to me like a failure of an idea or at least something dangerous. 

However, u can accept the opinions of others without denigrating them

You Are a pro GP right? From Montenegro. I can see you on annoncelight. So you Are not a sugarbabe yourself then.

[Guest yuki]

MikkelRæv64 skrev, 1 time siden:

You Are a pro GP right? From Montenegro. I can see you on annoncelight. So you Are not a sugarbabe yourself then.

As I said above, I tried to do it (additional info: for almost 4 months) but it carried too many risks.

I'm not from Montenegro but from Italy, I don't understand the relevance of that within the discourse. 
Anyway in my opinion we can also end it here, we have different perspectives. Peace  

[ild i piben 233]

Har bedt om at tråden flyttes, det er vist mere generel debat.

[Sugarmann 18]

ild i piben skrev, for 2 timer siden:

Har bedt om at tråden flyttes, det er vist mere generel debat.

Ud fra hvilken præmis?

i givet fald kan du tage og flytte halvdelen af indlæggene til generel debat.

indlægget drejer sig om sugarbabes og ikke generelt omkring alt andet 

[ild i piben 233]

Sugarmann skrev, for 6 minutter siden:

Ud fra hvilken præmis?

i givet fald kan du tage og flytte halvdelen af indlæggene til generel debat.

indlægget drejer sig om sugarbabes og ikke generelt omkring alt andet 

Hvilken Sugarbabe efterlyses der??

[Guest daddyo]

yuki skrev, for 12 timer siden:

I understand what you mean, but it seems to me like a failure of an idea or at least something dangerous. 

However, u can accept the opinions of others without denigrating them

Agrees, i treid , here, to get som knowledge about how to be a sugardad. I havent meet one here, Only men that is using professionels, And nothi9ng wrong vith that. But its dangerous when you meet vith totaly different ideas about a meeting, Things can easily go wrong. And i only hear complaints about prices, and not meeting professional sex making deals vith amateurs: Or complaints about women only wanting their money. Wel if you dont want a relation, and askes for sex , what did you expect ?

Redigeret 2. Februar, 2023 af daddyo

[Guest yuki]

daddyo skrev, for 17 minutter siden:

Agrees, i treid , here, to get som knowledge about how to be a sugardad. I havent meet one here, Only men that is using professionels, And nothi9ng wrong vith that. But its dangerous when you meet vith totaly different ideas about a meeting, Things can easily go wrong. And i only hear complaints about prices, and not meeting professional sex making deals vith amateurs: Or complaints about women only wanting their money. Wel if you dont want a relation, and askes for sex , what did you expect ?

I don't know if I have understood correctly. But I'll try to answer.

In my understanding basic escort = paid sex with a professional paid by the hour and that's it.

professional escort (or call it what you will) = not only paid sex but also paid entertainment always paid by the hour. 

sugarbabe = built up and long lasting exclusive relationship with sex and entertainment, paid not by the hour. Paid back with money or gifts. 

So maybe now it's clearer what I meant before.

The problem as you say is that everyone gives their own free interpretation of that concept, that's why - at least for me - it doesn't add up.

it's a practice - if I'm not mistaken - born recently and glorified by the internet world. 
That is why - in my opinion - it has not yet received a public framing.  

[Mand_45 8]

yuki skrev, for 17 minutter siden:

I don't know if I have understood correctly. But I'll try to answer.

In my understanding basic escort = paid sex with a professional paid by the hour and that's it.

professional escort (or call it what you will) = not only paid sex but also paid entertainment always paid by the hour. 

sugarbabe = built up and long lasting exclusive relationship with sex and entertainment, paid not by the hour. Paid back with money or gifts. 

So maybe now it's clearer what I meant before.

The problem as you say is that everyone gives their own free interpretation of that concept, that's why - at least for me - it doesn't add up.

it's a practice - if I'm not mistaken - born recently and glorified by the internet world. 
That is why - in my opinion - it has not yet received a public framing.  

Thank you for the definition! I often get confused!

[Bananas 17565]

 

yuki skrev, 1 time siden:

 

it's a practice - if I'm not mistaken - born recently and glorified by the internet world. 
That is why - in my opinion - it has not yet received a public framing.  

Back in the days, long before you or the Internet were born, wealthy men often had so called "kept ladies" - in Swedish the word is "hålldam", a fantastic word. That meant that he supported her financially, paid for her apartment, her clothes, her overhead costs and what have you - but he never paid her for sex. Often he had a wife and a family, and the kept lady aside as a more or less hidden asset in his life. And she was more often than not faithful to him. True love between the two parties often occured, but was never allowed to interfere in his life.

I've in my life known some nobles, that kept such ladies. For them, these ladies were sort of a surviving kit - a tool used to be able to continue their lives as expected in their societies and families, without slowly dying inside.

The Sugardating industry is a way of trying to digitize and rationalize that old concept, and as almost always nowadays - especially on the Internet - an idea that waters down and hollows out a special sort of relation that once was understandable. Albeit neither available for all, nor appreciated by the married women.

Sugardating is sort of trying to implement the old kept lady-concept, into a cheap super-market where prices are more important than appearances and sex always overrides long-term relations. A supermarket where everybody can afford to buy something, no matter their financial standings.

Even if kept ladies was and is an unequal concept - both gender wise and economically - it's possible to understand it.

The Sugardating industry is just plain awkward and a bit trashy if you ask me.

So don't ask me.

[Guest daddyo]

yuki skrev, for 8 timer siden:

I don't know if I have understood correctly. But I'll try to answer.

In my understanding basic escort = paid sex with a professional paid by the hour and that's it.

professional escort (or call it what you will) = not only paid sex but also paid entertainment always paid by the hour. 

sugarbabe = built up and long lasting exclusive relationship with sex and entertainment, paid not by the hour. Paid back with money or gifts. 

So maybe now it's clearer what I meant before.

The problem as you say is that everyone gives their own free interpretation of that concept, that's why - at least for me - it doesn't add up.

it's a practice - if I'm not mistaken - born recently and glorified by the internet world. 
That is why - in my opinion - it has not yet received a public framing.  

i agrees and i had 3 sugarbabes, and only meet them in nearly 9 years, the rest was on the clock, or sex was.We could spend more time talking often

[Rallende 53]

yuki skrev, for 10 timer siden:

I don't know if I have understood correctly. But I'll try to answer.

In my understanding basic escort = paid sex with a professional paid by the hour and that's it.

professional escort (or call it what you will) = not only paid sex but also paid entertainment always paid by the hour. 

sugarbabe = built up and long lasting exclusive relationship with sex and entertainment, paid not by the hour. Paid back with money or gifts. 

So maybe now it's clearer what I meant before.

The problem as you say is that everyone gives their own free interpretation of that concept, that's why - at least for me - it doesn't add up.

it's a practice - if I'm not mistaken - born recently and glorified by the internet world. 
That is why - in my opinion - it has not yet received a public framing.  

"Problemet" er  de forskellige definitioner af samme emne. Selvom ordene er de samme så er betydningen forskellig i de forskellige lande og også forskellig i selve Danmark.

Også sociale , uddannelsesmæssige og regionale forhold gør opfattelser forskellige.

 

 

[Guest daddyo]

Rallende skrev, for 23 minutter siden:

"Problemet" er  de forskellige definitioner af samme emne. Selvom ordene er de samme så er betydningen forskellig i de forskellige lande og også forskellig i selve Danmark.

Også sociale , uddannelsesmæssige og regionale forhold gør opfattelser forskellige.

 

 

ja , de fleste som møder sugarbabes i danmark, vil få betegnelsen spender daddy i usa, 
Og Problemet herinde , er at de brugere som er her, Nok ikke typisk er dem som vil søge en sugarbabe , Men tager en chance for at prøve noget nyt, uden at ville en relation som man ellers vil have til en sugarbabe